[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13920290#comment-13920290
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-76:
-------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Apache Phoenix - Branch:master #105 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Phoenix/105/])
PHOENIX-76 Fix perf regression due to PHOENIX-29 (JamesTaylor) (jamestaylor:
rev 2581c20fba120466e4d1337e6ba086a435a07f2a)
* phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/iterate/ParallelIterators.java
> Fix perf regression due to PHOENIX-29
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-76
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-76
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Assignee: Anoop Sam John
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-76.patch, patch.diff
>
>
> Many queries got slower as a result of PHOENIX-29. There are a few simple
> checks we can do to prevent the adding of the new filter:
> - if the query is an aggregate query, as we don't return KVs in this case, so
> we're only doing extra processing that we don't need. For this, you can check
> statement.isAggregate().
> - if there are multiple column families referenced in the where clause, as
> the seek that gets done is better in this case because we'd potentially be
> seeking over an entire stores worth of data into a different store.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
