[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13933915#comment-13933915
]
Gabriel Reid commented on PHOENIX-842:
--------------------------------------
{quote}Should this go on the 3.0 and 4.0 branches as well?{quote}
>From my point of view: yes, this should go in the 3.0 and 4.0 branches. Not
>doing that will pollute directory structure of maven repos, as well as making
>the upgrade path more complex for anyone relying on these artifacts.
There's also a note on the [ASF guidelines for publishing to maven
repos|http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#signing-up]
that says they should be in a sub-group of org.apache.
> Use better namespace for maven artifacts
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-842
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-842
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Gabriel Reid
> Attachments: PHOENIX-842.patch, PHOENIX-842_2.patch
>
>
> The current groupId used in Phoenix maven artifacts is "org.apache". The
> typical groupId used for java-based Apache projects is
> "org.apache.$projectName", which nicely namespaces all sub-projects within
> the project namespace (see
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/ for
> examples)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
