Verified the signature
-Downloaded the srcs
-Ran test cases.  All passes.
Looks good.
+1 from me.

Regards
Ram

-----Original Message-----
From: James Taylor [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2014 4:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1

Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1. Thanks for 
the feedback on the previous RC. This is the next major release of Phoenix 
compatible with the 0.98 branch of Apache HBase (0.98.1+) and will be our third 
release in the incubator. The release includes both a source-only release and a 
convenience binary release.

The 4.0.0 release has feature parity with our pending 3.0.0 release. New 
features include:
- Equi-joins through broadcast hash join
- Shared tables over same physical HBase table
- Read-only and updatable views
- Multi-tenancy
- JDBC ARRAY type
- Sequence creation and usage

The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/phoenix/phoenix-4.0.0-incubating-rc1/src/

The binary artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/phoenix/phoenix-4.0.0-incubating-rc1/bin/

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mujtaba.asc

KEYS file available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/phoenix/KEYS

The tag to be voted upon:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v4.0.0-incubating-rc1

For information about the contents of this release see:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/v4.0.0-incubating-rc1

Release notes
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12326145&styleName=Text&projectId=12315120&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C34a706e780c7e8f198c9ca903e80572b560599b6%7Clin

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote:

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
James

Reply via email to