[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13980030#comment-13980030
 ] 

James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-136:
--------------------------------------

[~jhanit], [~damien.carol] - FYI we have derived table implemented in our 
3.0,4.0, and master branch (including for joins with some restrictions). 
Getting ready next week to release this as a 3.1/4.1 release (along with our 
enhanced Pig Integration). Give a spin if you'd like a sneak peek.

> Support derived tables
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-136
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: James Taylor
>              Labels: enhancement
>
> Add support for derived queries of the form:
> SELECT * FROM ( SELECT company, revenue FROM Company ORDER BY revenue) LIMIT 
> 10
> Adding support for this requires a compile time change as well as a runtime 
> execution change. The first version of the compile-time change could limit 
> aggregation to only be allowed in the inner or the outer query, but not both. 
> In this case, the inner and outer queries can be combined into a single query 
> with the outer select becoming just a remapping of a subset of the projection 
> from the inner select. The second version of the compile-time change could 
> handle aggregation in the inner and outer select by performing client side 
> (this is likely a less common scenario).
> For the runtime execution, change the UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver would 
> be modified to look for a new "TopNLimit" attribute with an int value in the 
> Scan. This would control the maximum number of values for the coprocessor to 
> hold on to as the scan is performed. Then the 
> GroupedAggregatingResultIterator would be modified to handle keeping the topN 
> values received back from all the child iterators.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to