Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-phoenix/pull/30#discussion_r12057845
  
    --- Diff: 
phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/FirstByLastByFunctionIT.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,557 @@
    +/*
    + * Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
    + *
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.phoenix.end2end;
    +
    +import static org.junit.Assert.*;
    +import java.sql.*;
    +import org.junit.Test;
    +
    +/**
    + *
    + * @author tzolkincz
    + */
    +public class FirstByLastByFunctionIT extends BaseHBaseManagedTimeIT {
    +
    +   private void prepareTable() throws Exception {
    +           Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection(getUrl());
    +           String ddl = "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS firstBy "
    +                           + "(id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, page_id 
INTEGER,"
    +                           + " date INTEGER, \"value\" INTEGER)";
    +           conn.createStatement().execute(ddl);
    +
    +           //in value column will be 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, so 8 is the biggest
    +           for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
    +                   conn.createStatement().execute("UPSERT INTO firstBy 
(id, page_id, date, \"value\")"
    +                                   + " VALUES (" + i + ", 8, " + 100 * i + 
", " + i * 2 + ")");
    +           }
    +
    +           conn.commit();
    +   }
    +
    +   @Test
    +   public void testFirst() throws Exception {
    +           prepareTable();
    +           Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection(getUrl());
    +
    +           ResultSet rs = conn.createStatement().executeQuery(
    +                           "SELECT FIRST_BY(\"value\", date) FROM firstBy 
GROUP BY page_id");
    --- End diff --
    
    First, thank you very much for these new built-in functions, @tzolkincz - 
these are definitely generally useful. Perhaps we can imitate what SQL server 
and others do, but only support a limited subset for now. I don't think this 
would require any changes to your implementation - this would be a parser only 
change, as you'd still compile down to the same built-in function expression 
that you created:
    (FIRST_VALUE | LAST_VALUE) ( [scalar_expression ) 
        OVER ( [ partition_by_clause ] order_by_clause rows_range_clause ) 
    
    We wouldn't yet support a partition_by_clause and the only 
rows_range_clause we'd support would be to specify the Nth row (i.e. your 
offset argument) which would be a bit non standard. The order_by_clause would 
map to your second argument and if DESC is used instead of ASC, you'd just need 
to wrap this in a call to the INVERT built-in function.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to