-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/472/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for pig.


Summary
-------

Currently Pig map type is untyped, which means map value is always of 
bytearray(ie. unknown) type. In PIG-1277, we allow unknown type to be a shuffle 
key, which somewhat relieve the problem. However, typed map is still beneficial 
in that:

1. User can make semantic use of the map value type. Currently, user need to 
explicitly cast map value, which is ugly
2. Though PIG-1277 allow unknown type be a shuffle key, the performance 
suffers. We don't have a raw comparator for the unknown type, instead, we need 
to instantiate the value object and invoke its comparator


This addresses bug PIG-1876.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1876


Diffs
-----

  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/LoadCaster.java 
1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/ResourceSchema.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/backend/hadoop/executionengine/physicalLayer/expressionOperators/POCast.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/backend/hadoop/hbase/HBaseBinaryConverter.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/builtin/BinStorage.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/builtin/TextLoader.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/builtin/Utf8StorageConverter.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/data/DataType.java 
1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/impl/io/ReadToEndLoader.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/impl/logicalLayer/schema/Schema.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/LogicalExpPlanMigrationVistor.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/expression/MapLookupExpression.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/relational/LogicalSchema.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/visitor/ColumnAliasConversionVisitor.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/parser/AliasMasker.g
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/parser/AstValidator.g
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/parser/LogicalPlanGenerator.g
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/parser/QueryParser.g
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestPOCast.java
 1078206 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestTypedMap.java
 PRE-CREATION 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/472/diff


Testing
-------

test-patch:
     [exec] -1 overall.
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 6 new or 
modified tests.
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning 
messages.
     [exec]
     [exec]     -1 javac.  The applied patch generated 866 javac compiler 
warnings (more than the trunk's current 860 warnings).
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs 
warnings.
     [exec]
     [exec]     -1 release audit.  The applied patch generated 536 release 
audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 531 warning

All javac warnings are related to diff in parser. Only one new file 
TestTypedMap.java is added, and it contains proper header, so ignore release 
audit warning.

Unit test:
    all pass

End-to-end test:
    all pass


Thanks,

Daniel

Reply via email to