[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012612#comment-13012612
 ] 

Laukik Chitnis commented on PIG-1881:
-------------------------------------

Yes, that is correct. None of the two methods change the state of the original 
DAG though, so I think it should be safe. Originally, it was using the clone() 
method in Graph, but since we were using an unconventional method for cloning, 
I opted for a new duplicate() method rather than overriding clone(). I assumed 
that the old methods were removed since they were no longer used, but I would 
like to know as well if there was some other reason.

> Need a special interface for Penny (Inspector Gadget)
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-1881
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1881
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: impl
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0
>            Reporter: Alan Gates
>            Assignee: Laukik Chitnis
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>         Attachments: PIG-1881-4.patch, toolsserver.patch
>
>
> The proposed Penny tool needs access to Pig's new logical plan in order to 
> inject code into the the dataflow.  Once it has modified the plan it needs to 
> then be able to hand back that modified plan and have Pig execute it.
> As we don't want to open this functionality up to general users, the proposal 
> is to do this by subclasses PigServer with a new class that is marked as 
> LimitedPrivate for Penny only.  This class will provide calls to parse a Pig 
> Latin script and return a logical plan, and one to take a logical plan and 
> execute it.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to