-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/587/#review461
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


+1

- thejas


On 2011-04-13 00:11:37, Daniel Dai wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/587/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-04-13 00:11:37)
> 
> 
> Review request for pig and thejas.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> See PIG-1979
> 
> 
> This addresses bug PIG-1979.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1979
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/branches/branch-0.8/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/expression/DereferenceExpression.java
>  1091122 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/branches/branch-0.8/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestEvalPipeline2.java
>  1091122 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/587/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Test-patch:
>      [exec] +1 overall.  
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or 
> modified tests.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning 
> messages.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total 
> number of javac compiler warnings.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs 
> warnings.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the 
> total number of release audit warnings.
> 
> Unit-test:
>     all pass
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel
> 
>

Reply via email to