[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027174#comment-13027174
 ] 

Richard Ding commented on PIG-2012:
-----------------------------------

test-patch result:

{code}
     [exec] -1 overall.  
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or 
modified tests.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning 
messages.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     -1 javac.  The applied patch generated 964 javac compiler 
warnings (more than the trunk's current 963 warnings).
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs 
warnings.
     [exec] 
     [exec]     +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of release audit warnings.
{code}

> Comments at the begining of the file throws off line numbers in errors
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-2012
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2012
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: impl
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0
>            Reporter: Alan Gates
>            Assignee: Richard Ding
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>         Attachments: PIG-2012_1.patch, macro.pig
>
>
> The preprocessor does not appear to be handling leading comments properly 
> when calculating line numbers for error messages.  In the attached script, 
> the error is reported to be on line 7.  It is actually on line 10.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to