Excellent. 0.9.2 it is, then ! Thanks @squarecog. - milind
On 9/30/11 11:26 AM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <[email protected]> wrote: >9.1 just went up for vote, and holding up a release to add 0.22 >compatibility seems ill-advised. >I would be willing to help get 9.2 out in short order to provide >compatibility with 22, and I think Joep already did a bunch of work to >make >this happen. > >D > >On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dmitry, >> >> So, your suggestion would be to try and get 0.9.1 compatible with Hadoop >> 0.22 ? Would there be an interest from pig committers to see that >>through, >> as a 0.9.2 perhaps ? >> >> - Milind >> >> --- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> Greenplum Labs, EMC >> (Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, >>and >> do not necessarily represent the views of any organization, past or >> present, the author might be affiliated with.) >> >> >> >> On 9/29/11 4:30 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Pig 8.2 is likely not going to happen (0 interest from any of the >> >committers). >> > >> >0.9 has already been released, 9.1 is in the works, as is 10. >> > >> >Not sure how Milind compiled that list of features in 0.9 but it's >>kind of >> >an odd grab-bag of 0.8 and 0.9 features. >> > >> >The MASSIVE improvement 0.9 introduced is macros. There are other >>things; >> >one unheralded in the 3 blog posts below is that handling of nested >> >structures is cleaned up a lot (in a subtly non-backwards-compatible >>way). >> > >> >http://www.hortonworks.com/new-apache-pig-features-part-1-macro/ >> >http://www.hortonworks.com/new-apache-pig-features-part-2-embedding/ >> >(note: >> >not udfs in other languages, that was already in 8). >> > >> >>http://www.hortonworks.com/new-apache-pig-0-9-features-part-3-additional- >>f >> >eatures/ >> > >> > >> >On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> 2011/9/29 <[email protected]>: >> >> > [CC'ng Pig-dev]. >> >> > >> >> > In terms of interest, what is the community more interested in >>seeing >> >> work >> >> > with Hadoop 0.22 ? Pig 0.8.x or Pig.0.9. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I took a look at pig 0.9 added features: >> >> > >> >> > New parser (still has corner cases) >> >> > UDFs in languages other than Java >> >> > Macros >> >> > Hcatalog support >> >> > >> >> > As far as existing installations are concerned, my belief is that >> >>these >> >> > features do not make a very compelling case for pig 0.9 to be >> >>compatible >> >> > immediately with Hadoop 0.22, and pig 0.8.x makes more sense. >> >> > >> >> > What do people think ? >> >> >> >> Personally, I'd like to see both of these code lines to have a >> >> compatibility >> >> releases to address 0.22/0.23 issues. Also, I'd be totally happy with >> >> 0.9 NOT addressing this issues if there's 0.10 planned soon enough. >> >> >> >> As for 0.8 I really, really, really would like to see a compatibility >> >> release. >> >> From the Bigtop side, I can help with build and testing, but I guess >>we >> >> need somebody from the Pig community to chime in on how feasible >> >> 0.8.2 will be. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Roman. >> >> >> >>
