[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13184177#comment-13184177
 ] 

Alex Rovner commented on PIG-2462:
----------------------------------

One way to avoid this issue is to disable combinedinputformat in your pigs jobs.

I guess I am a bit confused about the comments on the splitIndex as I am not 
very familiar with PIG's code base. Is split index used elsewhere and is not 
really meant to track the index of the current pigsplit that we are reading? If 
so, I can certainly change the patch to include another variable "idx" as 
suggested to keep track of this value.

How ever judging from the PigInputFormat.getPigSplits code:
for (int i = 0; i < combinedSplits.size(); i++)
                pigSplits.add(createPigSplit(combinedSplits.get(i), inputIndex, 
targetOps, i, conf));

Seems like the intention was to use splitIndex to track the current split?

                
> getWrappedSplit is incorrectly returning the first split instead of the 
> current split.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-2462
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2462
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.1, 0.11
>            Reporter: Alex Rovner
>             Fix For: 0.11
>
>         Attachments: splitsfix.patch
>
>
> If your loader needs information regarding what file is currently is being 
> read (lets say for schema information), currently provides this ability by 
> calling prepareToRead every time we read a new split. This is critical for 
> ComibinedInputFormat as each mapper can read more then one file. In order for 
> the load function to know what file we are currently reading, it should call 
> getWrappedSplit() to get that information. How ever, getWrappedSplit always 
> returns the first split in the list. Code from PigSplit.java:
>     /**
>      * This methods returns the actual InputSplit (as returned by the 
>      * {@link InputFormat}) which this class is wrapping.
>      * @return the wrappedSplit
>      */
>     public InputSplit getWrappedSplit() {
>         return wrappedSplits[0];
>     }
> Furthermore, in PigRecordReader.java the splitIndex is never incremented when 
> changing from split to split. So in fact, even if getWrappedSplit() wold be 
> changed to return wrappedSplits[splitIndex]; it would still return the 
> incorrect index. 
> This can be fixed by changing PigRecordReader to increment 
> PigSplit.splitIndex everytime the split chagnes in the following code:
>     /**
>      * Get the record reader for the next chunk in this CombineFileSplit.
>      */
>     protected boolean initNextRecordReader() throws IOException, 
> InterruptedException {
>         if (curReader != null) {
>             curReader.close();
>             curReader = null;
>             if (idx > 0) {
>                 progress += pigSplit.getLength(idx-1);    // done processing 
> so far
>             }
>         }
>         // if all chunks have been processed, nothing more to do.
>         if (idx == pigSplit.getNumPaths()) {
>             return false;
>         }
>         // get a record reader for the idx-th chunk
>         try {
>           
>             curReader =  
> inputformat.createRecordReader(pigSplit.getWrappedSplit(idx), context);
>             LOG.info("Current split being processed 
> "+pigSplit.getWrappedSplit(idx));
>             if (idx > 0) {
>                 // initialize() for the first RecordReader will be called by 
> MapTask;
>                 // we're responsible for initializing subsequent 
> RecordReaders.
>                 curReader.initialize(pigSplit.getWrappedSplit(idx), context);
>                 pigSplit.get
>                 loadfunc.prepareToRead(curReader, pigSplit);
>             }
>         } catch (Exception e) {
>             throw new RuntimeException (e);
>         }
>         idx++;
>         return true;
>     }
> }

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to