[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13270713#comment-13270713
 ] 

Ashutosh Chauhan commented on PIG-2673:
---------------------------------------

bq. I don't think you can relax the conditions around distinct, since that 
involves hashing the input across reducers?

Yeah, thats right. For other blocking operators:
* Order-by: obv we can relax it.
* Join/Cogroup: We can relax for map-side joins & cogroups i.e., FR,Merge Join 
and cogroup, but not the ones having reducers.


                
> Allow Merge join to follow an ORDER statement
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-2673
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2673
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Dmitriy V. Ryaboy
>            Assignee: Dmitriy V. Ryaboy
>         Attachments: PIG-2673_0.patch
>
>
> Currently, we insist that data for a merge join must come from an 
> OrderedLoadFunc.
> We can relax this condition and allow explicit ordering operations to precede 
> a MergeJoin.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to