[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13433323#comment-13433323
]
Dmitriy V. Ryaboy commented on PIG-2871:
----------------------------------------
Overall, I approve, but given the MRO, do we still need to pass in POLoads?
They are trivially accessible from the MRO, and passing them in separately
seems like an opportunity to pass in something wrong (an mro that doesn't
actually have inputs from the supplied loaders).
> Refactor signature for PigReducerEstimator
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIG-2871
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2871
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.11
> Reporter: Bill Graham
> Assignee: Bill Graham
> Attachments: PIG-2871.1.patch
>
>
> The signature to this method should be refactored to provide more context so
> the implementer has access to the map and reduce plans. Also passing both
> {{Job}} and {{Configuration}} is redundant, since the latter can be obtained
> by the former.
> I propose changing this:
> {noformat}
> int estimateNumberOfReducers(Configuration conf, List<POLoad> lds, Job job)
> throws IOException;
> {noformat}
> To this:
> {noformat}
> int estimateNumberOfReducers(Job job, List<POLoad> lds, MapReduceOper
> mapReduceOper) throws IOException;
> {noformat}
> This interface is evolving and hasn't yet been released so this is safe.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
