Hi, On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Olga Natkovich <onatkov...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Gianmarco, > > Thanks for your comments. Here is a little more information. > > At Yahoo, we consider the following issues to be P1: > > (1) Bugs that cause wrong results being produced silently > (2) Bugs that cause failures with no easy workaround >
Thanks Olga, now I get what you mean. I don't have a strong opinion on this. On one hand I see why you don't want to put too many patches in the branches in order to keep things stable. On the other hand when we do a 0.10.x release with x>0 the users would like to have as many bugs fixed as possible. > Regarding tests. I would suggest we have different rules for trunk and > branches: > > (1) For branches, I think we should run the full regression suite (including > e2e) prior to commit. This way we can ensure branch stability and, as number > of patches should be small, will not be a burden > (2) For trunk, we can go with test-commit only and fix things quickly when > things break. I think this makes sense. +1 > Olga Cheers, -- Gianmarco
