> On March 20, 2013, 12:42 a.m., Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/PColFilterExtractor.java, > > line 229 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10035/diff/1/?file=272254#file272254line229> > > > > looks like tabulation is off?
The whole file uses tab for indent instead of spaces. The code I added has space for indent which makes it look as if the indentation is wrong in the patch. But viewing in a editor it is fine. Based on discussion in PIG-3008, new code or modifications should adhere to "No tabs, No trailing white spaces, 4 spaces to indent the code" and not change parts of the code not touched or apply common sense as applicable. But in this case, changing tabs to spaces will change every line of code and also if blocks are not indented properly in many places. So did not make further whitespace changes. > On March 20, 2013, 12:42 a.m., Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/PColFilterExtractor.java, > > line 220 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10035/diff/1/?file=272254#file272254line220> > > > > remove dead code? Will do > On March 20, 2013, 12:42 a.m., Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/PColFilterExtractor.java, > > line 240 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10035/diff/1/?file=272254#file272254line240> > > > > please fix whitespace Will do > On March 20, 2013, 12:42 a.m., Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestPartitionFilterPushDown.java, > > line 433 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10035/diff/1/?file=272255#file272255line433> > > > > is this new code or is this RB being funny? > > > > either way, dead code can be deleted; this is preferable to commenting > > it out. I didn't want those test cases to get lost. So commented them out for now. Will revert it in this patch and create a separate jira to write equivalent test cases that actually assert for those cases. Need to have this class well tested to avoid full table scans with hcatalog. > On March 20, 2013, 12:42 a.m., Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/PColFilterExtractor.java, > > line 224 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10035/diff/1/?file=272254#file272254line224> > > > > (A and B) or (C and D) > > > > is impossible if (A or C) is false. We can push this up, while > > retaining the original filter to apply the original filter. So just to confirm, you want to extract A and C from each AND condition and push (A OR C) as the partition filter for optimization and still leave ((A AND B) or (C AND D)) to be applied on each tuple? - Rohini ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10035/#review18127 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 20, 2013, 12:16 a.m., Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10035/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 20, 2013, 12:16 a.m.) > > > Review request for pig. > > > Description > ------- > > 1) Fixed cases where partition pushdown was not happening for AND and OR > construct > 2) Commented out the negative test cases as they were actually not asserting > anything. > > > This addresses bug PIG-3173. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3173 > > > Diffs > ----- > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/PColFilterExtractor.java > 1458047 > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestPartitionFilterPushDown.java > 1458047 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10035/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Unit tests added and tested few cases manually with hcat. > > > Thanks, > > Rohini Palaniswamy > >
