+1 The full test suite is passing. I don't think we need not make a new rc just for one license header missing. Daniel, is it OK for you ? Thanks, Julien
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > My fault for missing license header for > UDFContextTestLoaderWithSignature. Added it to both files, Thanks > Prashant! > > I run unit tests/e2e tests, both passed. +1 for the rc except for the > license header issue. > > Daniel > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Prashant Kommireddi > <prash1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Downloaded tarball and performed the following: >> >> 1. ant releaseaudit - UDFContextTestLoaderWithSignature ( >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1458036) and >> DOTParser.jjt do not have Apache License header. >> 2. Verified RELEASE_NOTES.txt for correct version numbers >> 3. Verified build.xml points to next version (0.11.2) SNAPSHOT >> 4. Built and tested Piggybank, Built tutorial - looks good. >> 5. Tested jar by running scripts against 0.20.2 hadoop cluster (would be >> great to have someone else test the same) >> 6. ant test-commit - all tests pass >> >> Except for #1, RC looks good to me. >> Thanks, >> -Prashant >> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Bill Graham <billgra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.1. This is a maintenance >>> release >>> of Pig 0.11. >>> >>> Keys used to sign the release are available at: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup >>> >>> Please download, test, and try it out: >>> http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.1-candidate-0/ >>> >>> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Thursday EOD, Mar 28th. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Bill >>>
