Could we get PIG-3454 as well?

Thanks :)

Erik

On 2013-09-20, at 18:46 , Julien Le Dem <jul...@ledem.net> wrote:

> I'd like to get PIG-3445 in too.
> Julien
> 
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> 
>> With regard to branching 0.12, I will try to commit PIG-2417 and Cheolsoo
>> will probably commit PIG-3471. After that I will branch 0.12, hopefully
>> over the weekend. Anything I miss?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Russell Jurney
>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> 
>>> +1, I need PIG-2417 too.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Jeremy Karn <jk...@mortardata.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have one JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2417 that I
>>>> would
>>>> like to get into 0.12 because we've had a number of people ask us about
>>>> getting it committed back to Apache.  However, if it looks like too much
>>> to
>>>> review and get committed in the next week or two it could probably be
>>>> pushed off.
>>>> 
>>>> I also have 3 small jiras (3426, 3430, 3431) I'd like to get into 0.12.
>>>> I'm going to double check the submitted patches today because I think
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3419 might have broken the
>>>> currently submitted patches.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Prashant Kommireddi <prash1...@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 for a 0.12 release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have one outstanding JIRA
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3199
>>>>> .
>>>>> Cheolsoo was fine with the patch (except for a typo which I will
>>> correct)
>>>>> but wanted a second opinion. Can someone please take a look?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jar...@apache.org
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll try to clean up and finish PIG-3390 (HBase 0.95 support) this
>>>> week,
>>>>>> to see if it can be included.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jarcec
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:56:42AM -0700, Cheolsoo Park wrote:
>>>>>>> +1. I will go through my jiras this week.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com
>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi, All,
>>>>>>>> It has been more than half a year since initial Pig 0.11 release.
>>>> I'd
>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> roll a Pig 0.12 release around the end of September or the
>>>> beginning
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> October. Let me know if it is possible.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Proposed schedule:
>>>>>>>> 1. Commit all major features (1-2 weeks)
>>>>>>>> 2. Branching Pig 0.12
>>>>>>>> 3. Commit remaining patches (1-2 weeks)
>>>>>>>> 4. Wrapping up, document (1 week)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If you have patches want to get in, please make sure the Jira
>>>> ticket
>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>> fix version set to 0.12. If the patches originally set to 0.12
>>> and
>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> think you can delay, please mark the fix version to either 0.13.0
>>>> or
>>>>>>>> 0.12.1.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>>>>>> entity to
>>>>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
>>>>> confidential,
>>>>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
>>> the
>>>>>> reader
>>>>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>>>>> notified
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
>>>> have
>>>>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>>>>> immediately
>>>>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> Jeremy Karn / Lead Developer
>>>> MORTAR DATA / 519 277 4391 / www.mortardata.com
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
>>> datasyndrome.com
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> 

Reply via email to