The vote passed. Praveen and Mayur will be branch committers for Pig-on-Spark. Once they have new ASF accounts, they will manage the branch.
I'll create Spark branch shortly. On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Cheolsoo Park <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. I will start a vote today and get back to you in few days. > > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I would second Mayur - as he and Praveen are most familiar with all the >> changes, I would let them be the only additional branch committers. I’m >> expecting that they will review other contributor's patches similarly as >> normal committers and hence the contributors will start building Karma to >> get the “branch committership” later as well (if the branch will be around >> for that long). >> >> Jarcec >> >> On Aug 26, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Mayur Rustagi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Praveen & me should be good enough for us. We will have 1-2 more folks >> > contributing from Sigmoid but we can manage by merging patches from >> them. >> > >> > Initially it will be good to structure patches through us as we >> > would like to avoid breaking architecture & flow. >> > >> > Regards >> > Mayur >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Cheolsoo Park <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi guys, >> >> >> >> I asked about branch committership to the infra mailing list, and here >> is >> >> the reply- >> >> >> >> Many projects have what they consider 'partial committers' that is >> >> folks who have access to specific parts of a projects svn tree. Some >> >> projects do this for GSoC participants, others as a mechanism for >> >> moving to 'full committership' within the project. >> >> >> >> Do note though that in the eyes of the ASF someone with an ICLA and an >> >> account with any permissions to commit code anywhere in the public svn >> >> tree is a committer. IOW, you would vote, have ICLAs filed, and >> >> request account creation as per normal, and then merely adjust the >> >> karma in asf-authorization-template (and or LDAP) >> >> >> >> >> >> Looks like we need to vote and follow the normal process just like any >> >> other new committer. >> >> >> >> @Praveen, Jacec, >> >> I think Mayur and Praveen from Sigmoid Analytics need branch >> committership. >> >> Will anyone else work on Pig-on-Spark? Please reply. >> >> >> >> Once I have a full list of people, I will open a vote for Pig PMCs. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Cheolsoo >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Cheolsoo Park <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Additionally, I will give "branch-specific" commit permission to >> people >> >>> who will work on Pig on Spark (assuming it is possible). >> >>> >> >>> Please let me know if you have any objection on this too. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho < >> [email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> No objections from my side, thank you for creating the branch >> Cheolsoo >> >>>> and kudos to the Sigmoid Analytics team for the great work! >> >>>> >> >>>> Jarcec >> >>>> >> >>>> On Aug 25, 2014, at 7:14 PM, Cheolsoo Park <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi devs, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Sigmoid Analytics has been working on Pig-on-Spark (PIG-4059), and >> >> they >> >>>> want to merge their work into Apache. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I am going to create a "Spark" branch for them. Please let me know >> if >> >>>> you have any concerns. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> Cheolsoo >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Mayur Rustagi >> > Ph: +1 (760) 203 3257 >> > http://www.sigmoidanalytics.com >> > @mayur_rustagi <http://www.twitter.com/mayur_rustagi> >> >> >
