[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-5276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16106921#comment-16106921
]
Nandor Kollar commented on PIG-5276:
------------------------------------
[~kellyzly] [~knoguchi] how about having a new clean target (which we'll call
from jar target) identical with the current clean, but without deleting
{{$\{docs.dir\}/build}} and {{$\{jdiff.xml.dir\}\$\{name\}_$\{version\}.xml}}?
I think we should delete the rest.
> building "jar" should not call "clean"
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIG-5276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-5276
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Reporter: Koji Noguchi
> Priority: Minor
>
> When adding spark 2 in PIG-5157, we started calling "clean" from inside
> "jar" target.
> To me, "jar" action should be limited to archiving classes.
> For example, when I run
> % ant javadoc
> % ant jar
> I should not see javadoc gone after the second line.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
