[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16327955#comment-16327955
 ] 

Rohini Palaniswamy commented on PIG-4608:
-----------------------------------------

bq. As for the 'update val AS col' versus 'update col BY val', I think the 
former looks less confusing to a current pig user.
Agree and prefer usage of AS. Also BY does not make sense grammatically. It 
should either be AS (update val AS col) or WITH (update col WITH val). 

bq. As for delete, I somehow prefer using drop.
I prefer drop as well as that is similar to the alter table drop column of SQL. 
Delete is generally used for rows.





> FOREACH ... UPDATE
> ------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-4608
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4608
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Haley Thrapp
>            Priority: Major
>
> I would like to propose a new command in Pig, FOREACH...UPDATE.
> Syntactically, it would look much like FOREACH … GENERATE.
> Example:
> Input data:
> (1,2,3)
> (2,3,4)
> (3,4,5)
> -- Load the data
> three_numbers = LOAD 'input_data'
> USING PigStorage()
> AS (f1:int, f2:int, f3:int);
> -- Sum up the row
> updated = FOREACH three_numbers UPDATE
> 5 as f1,
> f1+f2 as new_sum
> ;
> Dump updated;
> (5,2,3,3)
> (5,3,4,5)
> (5,4,5,7)
> Fields to update must be specified by alias. Any fields in the UPDATE that do 
> not match an existing field will be appended to the end of the tuple.
> This command is particularly desirable in scripts that deal with a large 
> number of fields (in the 20-200 range). Often, we need to only make 
> modifications to a few fields. The FOREACH ... UPDATE statement, allows the 
> developer to focus on the actual logical changes instead of having to list 
> all of the fields that are also being passed through.
> My team has prototyped this with changes to FOREACH ... GENERATE. We believe 
> this can be done with changes to the parser and the creation of a new 
> LOUpdate. No physical plan changes should be needed because we will leverage 
> what LOGenerate does.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to