No objections, and I would defer to the community on numbering (which right now means I defer to Tim ;) ).
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Ellison Anne Williams < eawilli...@apache.org> wrote: > Happy to be the RM again or give another committer the 'privilege' -- if I > don't hear otherwise, I will take it this month and someone else can assume > the duties in October. > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On 24 September 2016 at 19:58, Ellison Anne Williams < > > eawilli...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > In the spirit of release often (~1x per month), I would like to execute > > > another release in about a week (next Friday/Saturday). Any objections? > > > > > > If not, would you prefer that this release be 0.1.1 or 0.2.0? > > > > > > Darin - If the initial submodule refactor is completed by then, it > would > > be > > > a great addition to the release. If not, we will plan to roll it into > the > > > October release. > > > > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > I don't have a strong feeling about the name, until we get to the 1.0.0 > > release when we should adopt a major.minor.patch semantic version naming > > scheme. FWIW I'd probably pick 0.2.0. > > > > Are you volunteering to be RM again? We should rotate the 'privilege', > but > > there will be opportunities to do that with frequent releases. > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > >
