Yeah, it's more the improved memory usage that SWT.Virtual provides,
mostly by doing more work so that it's memory usage is roughly
  O(no rows displayed)
instead of
  O (no rows in model)

We could do that, but it has both a code complexity cost, and a feature
cost - some features become impossible to support because they would
require scanning through the entire model.

-- Noel


Greg Brown wrote:
>>> data sets in TableView ( but throwing huge globs of data at it is a data 
>>> control issue not a UI issue ). By making sure I didn't load data using the 
>>> UI 
>>> thread the app is nice to use even when under allot of stress.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> The Eclipse JFace/SWT project has a nice solution here, one that
>> may be worth copying - their table has an SWT.Virtual mode where it
>> treats the row-set-data like a virtual memory resource, only loading in
>> the bits it needs when they are needed for display.
>>     
> You could also write a table model (i.e. List implementation) that behaves 
> this way (fetches pages only as needed).
>
> However, overall TableView performance should be pretty good even with large 
> data sets. See this demo app:
>
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pivot/trunk/demos/src/org/apache/pivot/demos/million/
>
> You can get sample data files here:
>
>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pivot/site/trunk/www/assets/
>
> Copy them to a local directory and pass the base path to the app; e.g.:
>
>   --basePath=/Users/greg/assets
>
> On my machine, it loads a million rows in less than 10 seconds, and scrolls 
> smoothly. Make sure you allocate enough heap space, though - I needed 1.5GB 
> to load the largest data file:
>
>   -Xms128m -Xmx1536m
>
>   

Reply via email to