I like BXML because it reminds me its XML based. If you want to get rid of the two-concept you could call it BxmlLoader or BxmlReader. I think BxmlReader is more java like if I remember correctly and implies streaming semantics. If someone implements json or groovy reader then the name helps distinguish it better as well.
-----Original Message----- From: Greg Brown [mailto:gkbr...@mac.com] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 8:28 AM To: dev@pivot.apache.org Subject: BeanSerializer Hi all, You may have noticed that I renamed BeanSerializer to BXMLSerializer. It occurred to me that "BeanSerializer" fairly strongly implies a two-way bean serialization capability, which is not what BeanSerializer does. "BXMLSerializer" is clearer: it loads BXML files. It is also closer to WTKXSerializer, its predecessor - in fact, I found myself accidentally referring to it as BXMLSerializer more often than not. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about this change. Thanks, G
