Yeah, that's fine with me.
On 21 December 2010 20:33, Greg Brown <gk_br...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > (Cut & paste from earlier email...)
> > ...
> > // To be called by any class extending this which wishes to use a custom
> > skin
> > public TextArea(Class<? extends TextArea> componentClass) {
> > installSkin(componentClass);
> > setText("");
> > }
> > ...
> > This at least allows the subclassing of TextArea, but is not consistent
> with
> > the rest of the Components, and just hides the problem. It would still
> need
> > to be investigated properly and fixed later.
>
> That's the main reason I wasn't comfortable making this change for 2.0 - it
> may work, but it's probably not the "right" solution.
>
> I'd like 2.0.1 to follow 2.0 shortly - we already have a bunch of quick-hit
> items to include, and we can address this properly. Sound OK?
>
> G
>
>
