The vote passes with 3 binding +1s, 1 non-binding +1, and no 0s or -1s. We'll post the final binaries to the site and the central Maven repo shortly. We're hoping to issue a press release to coincide with the project release next week.
2010 was a great year for Pivot. The 1.5 release was issued in June, and 2.0 just makes it in under the wire as well! Thanks to all who participated in this release, and have a happy new year! Greg On Dec 30, 2010, at 10:33 PM, Todd Volkert wrote: > [ x ] +1 Publish > > Here's what I tested: > > - Verified all MD5, SHA, and PGP signatures against all artifacts > - Verified that the contents of the tar.gz artifacts matched that of the > zip artifacts exactly > - Verified that the contents of the source distribution matched that of > the SVN tag exactly > - Inspected the NOTICE and LICENSE files to make sure the licenses are > correct and that the files are in order > - Verified that the source distribution compiles without error (checked > clean, compile, doc, test, dist, and install targets) > - Inspected source and binary distribution RAT reports: > - Checked that all files were properly licensed > - Checked that all non-Pivot jars and applicable binary files were > covered by the NOTICE/LICENSE files as appropriate > > -T > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Todd Volkert <[email protected]> wrote: >> All: >> >> The Pivot 2.0 release candidate #2 has been tagged, packaged, and is >> ready for a vote. The artifacts, RAT reports, and KEYS file can be >> found at http://people.apache.org/~tvolkert/dist/pivot/v2.0/. The tag >> from which the release artifacts were generated can be found at >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pivot/tags/v2.0/. >> >> In addition, my PGP public code signing key can be found at the MIT >> key server (http://pgp.mit.edu/) and The SKS key server >> (http://www.pramberger.at/peter/services/keyserver/). >> >> Please vote to publish this release by Thursday, December 30 22:00 >> GMT. I'm allowing extra time because of the holidays, but voting may >> conclude early if people have the time to look earlier. >> >> In your vote, please include the testing you performed to arrive at your > vote. >> >> [ ] +1 Publish >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -0 >> [ ] -1 Don't publish >> >> Thanks, >> -T >>
