Most demo and tutorial apps should already be using ScriptApplication. The few cases where we could not (or didn't want to) use ScriptApplication didn't seem to justify creating a generic "WindowedApplication" class. For the other cases (in tests) it might make more sense, but IMO isn't worth the effort at this point since it doesn't really solve any major problem.
On Mar 22, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Sandro Martini wrote: > Hi Greg, > probably a better name could be WindowApplication or something similar > (suggestions are always welcome) ... and we could adapt existing classes > using it any time it's not possible to use ScriptApplication, ok ? > > Tell me, so as soon as possible I can start to make this little change. > > Bye > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-pivot-developers.417237.n3.nabble.com/WindowApplicationAdapter-for-samples-demos-etc-tp2712254p2714824.html > Sent from the Apache Pivot - Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
