Hi all,
I've just committed other (I hope near-final) changes to our new
pivot-archetype-quickstart (many thanks to our users for help, info,
code, etc).
Some info here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-397

I assigned this issue to 2.1 but probably it would be better to not
have it related to a specific release of Pivot ... but maybe could be
useful to have in JIRA a pivot-archetype-quickstart module (or
subproject) with its versioning, right ? In this case I don't know if
I have enough rights in JIRA for Pivot.


On sources:
- all sources are under /skunk , so anyone interested can download and
try :-) ...
We (Pivot Developers only) should do a vote on it (after the
generation of its release).

- maybe I could only add (to the generated application) usual LICENSE,
BUILD (with some info on how to build and run the generated
application), README (here maybe even a note to tell eclipse + m2e
users how to import and run), NOTICE files in root ... do you think
could be useful ?
I've just seen that inside the META-INF folder of archetype jar are
not present usual NOTICE, LICENSE, etc files (requested by Apache
compliance), so I'll add as soon as possible, and reattach updated zip
in jira ... seems a never-ending story :-) .

- after this, to freeze its version 1.0, I've just read here (
http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#staging-maven
) that one time added SCM coordinates to artifact pom.xml (currently
missing), release commands of maven should even tag its release in SVN
...


I'm sorry for all these questions (some are only work note for me) but
it's my first maven archetype, and to be released in a public
repository ... so suggestions are welcome, a lot. For example if you
find something other that's missing ...


Last, but important:
of course now we are more focused on 2.0.1 release of Pivot, so all
developers work on it (testing, etc) could be done just after the
release.
But if someone (even not Pivot developers) have some time to play on
it ... it will be very appreciated.


Comments ?

Bye,
Sandro

Reply via email to