Yes, that absolutely makes sense. The fact that it says "class" draws attention away from the fact that it is actually a Task.
On Jul 27, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Chris Bartlett wrote: > On 27 July 2011 23:37, Chris Bartlett <cbartlet...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So I might have approached it differently if ... >> the javadocs said 'Task that runs...' rather than 'Class that runs > > If nobody has any objections I will make that small change today.
