Hi Roger, so maybe our 2.1 could become more a 2.5 release ... what do you think ?
> I think it's a great idea. And it sounds like a Pivot 3.0 timeframe. Great. > I'm a little concerned, reading others' replies, about the "impedance > mismatch" that Noel mentioned and Greg's concern about font metrics, but in > general I think this is the "right way" to go (farther) forward. The key > thing for the short-term would be defining the "Pivot SPI" in your diagram > and getting the existing AWT plugged into it, which it sounds like you are > already working on. > So, count me in. For sure .-) . Just after the pluggable AWT backend I see even a pluggable JavaFX 2 backend (if compatible by license) ... could give us another vision on the future (and start playing with it). So, Niclas, do you like the idea to work on it in a pivot3_branch by copying existing trunk as a starting point (or if you prefer, start with a clean branch) ? And then move/copy there your changes ? Bye
