The vote did NOT passes with 2 binding +1, 0 non-binding -1, and no 0. See here for more info: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
Thank you very much to all who participated in this vote !! 2013/4/8 Roger and Beth Whitcomb <rogerandb...@rbwhitcomb.com> > My vote is: > > [+1] release > > Tests I performed: > - Verified the text RAT reports > - Compared SVN tags/2.0.3 with current branches/2.0.x contents. > - Downloaded .tar.gz and .zip files and verified MD5 and SHA-1 checksums > - Untar the sources and compare to current SVN "branches/2.0.x" > - Build (using "ant") the sources to verify no errors (using Java 1.6.0_43 > on OSX) > - Check the generated Javadoc (selected pages) > - Check the Javadoc generated from source vs. Javadoc packaged in the > binary distribution: > * Some non-date differences noted in the following files: > - index-all.html > - package-tree.html > - class-use/Dictionary.html > - class-use/Group.html > - class-use/List.ItemIterator.**html > - and some others > * I'm going to discount these as due to slightly different JDK versions > used > - Verify the correct version number in the README file > - Quick verify of the fixed bugs in RELEASE-NOTES > - Untar the binary distribution, unjar the files and verify selected files > same as the source .class build > - Plug the binary distribution files into our application and verified > correct operation of a number of things > > > ~Roger Whitcomb > >