Sandro,

I totally agree about voting on the same 2.0.3 artifacts.  There is no
reason for you to rebuild everything and other voters to re-test just
because of the Ant or git issues.

Chris


On 23 July 2013 16:43, Sandro Martini <sandro.mart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> now I'll restart another time the vote for 2.0.3 .
>
> Note that the issue for building Pivot sources with Ant-1.9.x has been
> resolved in sources (and already committed) BUT the vote will be done on
> the same artifacts of last vote (generating a release is really a time
> consuming job), so please don't report errors if you try to build with
> 1.9.x (it will be possible since 2.0.4).
>
> On the small issue with sources downloaded from Git (unnecessary for the
> vote, because release artifacts has to be tested), the same (I still have
> to commit some good .gitignore files in test folders, I'll do asap).
>
>
> Bye,
> Sandro
>
>
>
> 2013/7/20 Sandro Martini <sandro.mart...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi Chris,
> > welcome back.
> > In next days I'll restart another vote, but for usual 2.0.3 artifacts ...
> >
> > For small issues you find we can resolve them for 2.0.4 and 2.1.0 ... and
> > for missing test folders when downloading via git I can fix it (it's a
> good
> > thing to fix) but remember that ant test should be done on release
> sources.
> >
> > Let's update soon.
> >
> > Bye,
> > Sandro
> >  Il giorno 19/lug/2013 21:34, "Chris Bartlett" <cbartlet...@gmail.com>
> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > I realise that the last vote did not succeed due to insufficient binding
> >> votes and in particular because I was unable to complete my tests due to
> >> other commitments, so apologies again for that.  However I have now
> >> finally
> >> found the time to complete testing the 2.0.3 release candidate and am
> >> prepared to vote '+1 Publish' if another vote is called.
> >>
> >> - Download artefacts from
> >> http://people.apache.org/~smartini/pivot-2.0.3_release/
> >> - Verify MD5 & SHA checksums
> >> - Verify PGP signing
> >> - Review RAT files
> >> - Review LICENSE, NOTICE, README & RELEASE-NOTES files
> >> - Verify uncompressed content of corresponding 'zip' and 'tar.gz'
> archives
> >> are identical
> >> - Ensure downloaded apache-pivot-2.0.3-src.zip matches checked out
> source
> >> tagged as 2.0.3
> >>
> >> (Build env : Ubuntu 13.04 x64, Oracle JDK 1.7.0_25-b15 x64, Ant 1.8.2,
> >> JUnit 4.10)
> >> - Run ant clean test
> >>   - Ensure no tests fail
> >> - Run ant clean install
> >>   - Browse generated Javadoc in ./install/apache-pivot-2.0.3/doc
> >>   - Deploy WAR files from ./install/apache-pivot-2.0.3/webapps to Tomcat
> >> v7.0.40
> >>   - Test various applet & web start links
> >>     - Win 7 x64, Chrome 28.0.1500.72 m, Oracle JRE 1.7.0_25_b16 x86
> >>     - Ubuntu 13.04 x64, Firefox 22 & Opera 12.16, Oracle JDK
> 1.7.0_25-b15
> >> x64
> >>   - Check Kitchen Sink applet displays 'Pivot-2.0.3_00' as version in
> the
> >> 'Info' Rollup
> >> - Check other Ant targets
> >>
> >> I noticed a couple of small issues along the way, both of which have
> >> simple
> >> fixes
> >> 1) Ant 1.9.x is rejected as the overly simple version check in build.xml
> >> only looks for a 1.7 or 1.8 version prefix
> >> 2) 'ant test' fails when source is taken from a git repo as git does not
> >> store empty directories and a number of the <project>/test directories
> >> have
> >> no content
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7 June 2013 11:25, Sandro Martini <sandro.mart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The vote did NOT passes with 2 binding +1, 1 non-binding +1, and no 0.
> >> >
> >> > See here for more info:
> >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thank you very much to all who participated in this vote !!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >> >
> >>
> http://apache-pivot-developers.417237.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Pivot-2-0-3-Round-3-tp4025883p4025923.html
> >> > Sent from the Apache Pivot - Developers mailing list archive at
> >> Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to