Oh and regarding the "when do you need it?" ... well it seems the industry has 
great interest in PLC4X & Edgent ... and unfortunately currently the only 
usecase I am encountering is to read a lot of values in a batch and to relay 
that to another system ... so currently this is the most important feature in 
PLC4X and Edgent from an API point of view __

Chris

Am 03.02.18, 15:32 schrieb "Dale LaBossiere" <[email protected]>:

    When do we need it?  I know the sooner the better :-)
    My month is a bit hectic (retirement planning, wrapping up @ IBM, taking 
vacation days, etc :-)
    
    I’ve got to see where the plc API is now with respect to the objects and 
interactions for batch reads.
    But I expect adding a new fn like:
        static plc-batch-read-response-object  
batchSupplier(PlcConnectionAdapter, plc-batch-read-request-object)
    
    And probably want a fn that converts a batch-read-response-object to JSON 
so that it can then be published to Kafka/Elastic.  That to-JSON utility fn 
seems like something that could/should be added to the plc API if one doesn’t 
already exist.
    
    The real work is in PlcConnectionAdapter. A new package level method
        plc-read-request-object newSupplier(plc-read-request-object)
    
    Doesn’t seem like it should be too much work :-)
    
    — Dale
    
    > On Feb 1, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    > 
    > Hi all and hopefully Dale,
    > 
    > I have spent quite some time travelling and talking to people in the 
industry in the past few weeks. The interest in our Project and Apache Edgent 
is huge.
    > 
    > Now the use-case that I was asked about most, is to read multiple values 
in one request and to push that to somewhere (Usually Kafka or Elastic). Well 
guess they see PLC4X as a replacement for what they do now, guess it will take 
some time till they come up with more challenging requests ;-)
    > 
    > Right now the Edgent integration supports reading of single addresses. 
How would this look if we wanted to allow reading of a set of different 
addresses? Guess the result would probably be some sort of map-stream … do you 
have any idea how this should look like?
    > 
    > If you had some time (maybe some a bad weather day down in Florida … or 
the Ultra Music festival is so loud that you don’t want to leave your house ;-) 
) where you could give this feature a thought or two?
    > 
    > Chris
    
    

Reply via email to