Hi all,

ok ... so we were missing that Nexus was configured to receive PLC4X release 
artifacts, that has now been handled by Apache Infra and I managed to stage a 
first maven release.
You can inspect what is created here [1]. The source artifact that we will be 
voting on can be found here [2].
However I am currently at a customer and will probably upload the real release 
artifacts (source bundles) to where they are supposed to be and send the RC 
email later on today ... 

Just thought I'd give you a heads up ...

Chris



[1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheplc4x-1000/
[2] 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheplc4x-1000/org/apache/plc4x/plc4x-parent/0.1.0/plc4x-parent-0.1.0-source-release.zip


Am 17.09.18, 16:29 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>:

    Hi All,
    
    Ok ... so I just did a first test drive and rolled that back 
    I was informed by Andrey that even if I merged his changes and the pull 
request was closed, that the changes don't seem to be present in the current 
version. 
    This is really strange and not the first time ... I think I should 
investigate what's going on here ... 
    
    So we'll try to re-merge his latest changes and then I'll spin up the 
release another time (At least this way I could document what you have to do in 
such a situation)
    
    Chris
    
    Am 17.09.18, 15:09 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>:
    
        Just got this response from Kevin:
        
        "I just performed the release, it should propagate to Maven Central 
soonish."
        
        ... so it seems we have a go ... soonish ;-)
        
        Chris
        
        
        Am 17.09.18, 14:06 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" 
<[email protected]>:
        
            Hi All,
            
            well I just did a first dry-run of a release and encountered two 
problems:
            1: We are currently referencing an unreleased version of Apache 
Edgent (We could roll back to 1.2.0 but that version had security issues in its 
dependencies ... eventually I can fix this by overriding versions in 
dependencyManagement blocks)
            2: We are currently referencing an unreleased version of the 
EtherNet/IP driver ... I already contacted the maintainer and he said He'll try 
to release asap. (We could exclude the enip driver from the release for now)
            
            Chris
            
            Am 17.09.18, 10:35 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" 
<[email protected]>:
            
                Hi,
                
                I like the idea and I agree with 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.
                I think it is good to prepare a RC ASAP and give everybody some 
time for testing (I would like to do a lot) and then do the release.
                
                Julian
                
                Am 17.09.18, 09:21 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" 
<[email protected]>:
                
                    Hi all,
                    
                    as I have just merged the API changes back to master, I 
would like to start a discussion about our first release. I would like to 
prepare a Release Candidate (And write down the documentation for doing that) 
in the next one or two days.
                    
                    I would like it to be a version 0.1.0 ... the next version 
being 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT you think that’s ok?
                    
                    What do you think?
                    
                    Chris
                    
                
                
            
            
        
        
    
    

Reply via email to