Hi,

thanks for bringing that up.
I totally disagree with the first one, check.
The second is okay and the third also, so I can agree with both of those.
Do we use the resource plugin to generate it from a "template" which is human 
(and IDE) readable buth with placeholders?

Julian

Am 30.04.19, 16:04 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>:

    Hi all,
    
    After streamlining the build for C++ I now started to have a look at the 
Python part.
    
    So in the python world it seems as if usually a setup.py is created and 
then python executes that script to build the project.
    From a look at some sample python projects, it looks as if it generally 
contains some information we already have in the maven metadata.
    
    When executing an example build and looking at the result, it looked as if 
the build generates a “egg” (Zip with ending “egg”) that contains unmodified 
versions of the sources and resources. In addition the script seems to generate 
a “egg-info” directory which contains a lot of different text files, these are 
then also included in the egg-zip.
    
    So I think we have multiple options here:
    
      *   Have maven generate the egg-files from Maven exclusively
      *   Have maven generate a setup.py (by including data from maven to that 
file) and then run “python setup.py install” which then generates everything
      *   Write a setup.py (duplicating data from the pom) and executing a 
python build in the maven build
    
    The last option has the benefit of working out of the box with Python and 
probably any Python IDE (If there is such a thing) but would have the drawback 
that we need to manually adjust it to pom changes (Version during releases)
    The first option would eliminate the need for another build tool (but would 
also eliminate the running of tests or other fancy python stuff)
    The middle option would be a compromise … it wouldn’t work out of the box, 
but after running “mvnw generate-resources” it could generate the missing files 
and the Python IDEs would pick it up.
    
    I think the middle approach sort of feels like the sweet spot at the moment 
… or am I missing something here?
    Are there other options, I didn’t mention?
    
    What do you think?
    
    
    Chris
    
    
    

Reply via email to