+1 (binding) Naming does not matter for me. The CQ and Doc is there more important :P
Greetings Mathi Matthias Strljic, M.Sc. Universität Stuttgart Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW) Seidenstraße 36 70174 Stuttgart GERMANY Tel: +49 711 685-84530 Fax: +49 711 685-74530 E-Mail: matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Julian Feinauer <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> Gesendet: Monday, September 2, 2019 8:57 PM An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X Hi all, as the discussion seems to slow down and to stabilizes in [1] I take the freedom to start a vote. The vote is ONLY about accepting the project CRUNCH [2] as a subproject to PLC4X (its not about changing the TLPs Name, or changing the scope of the project or other things that came up during the DISCUSS). Before CRUNCH could be integrated it has to go through clearance from the incubator before being integrated into the project but also a PMC Vote is required. Also a name change is very likely as the current name conflicts with Apache Crunch [3]. As usual the vote will be open for at least 72hours and the options are +1 – accept CRUNCH as a subproject for PLC4X 0 – no opinion -1 – do not accept CRUNCH as a subproject for PLC4X (please give reasons for that) Thanks Julian [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/444ce99b0495e94177203ec4aff55dc91b8d78d8d9758ad0f8bb484f@%3Cdev.plc4x.apache.org%3E [2] https://github.com/pragmaticminds/crunch [3] http://crunch.apache.org/
