Hi Julian, Well I had a look and I doubt it's worth the effort ... and I'm already finished ;-)
Chris Am 04.09.19, 11:40 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <[email protected]>: Yep, would have hoped that. Perhaps we can even refactor common shit out, but only i fit makes sense. Am 04.09.19, 10:03 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: Guess it will be sort of a clone of your work, just using a different mechanism to get a "Handle" ... and a little extra code for a thread to send the packets at the right time. Chris Am 04.09.19, 09:30 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <[email protected]>: Sounds like... I could offer some support but I guess it should be rather straightforward based on raw-sockets, or? J Am 04.09.19, 09:11 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: Hi all, now that we have a working raw-socket Netty input. I would like to use that to use something we can use to build passive-mode drivers. The idea is to build something, that doesn’t use a real network device, but instead uses a pcap WireShark dump. So we could simply record the network traffic of a system and use the pcap file to build drivers for that without having to be at the location. I was thinking that it could read the time-codes to fire the recorded packets in almost the same interval as they occurred in real life. What do you think? Good idea? Chris
