Referring to Justin's -1: As the classes are extremely simple (They were generated by the SP archetype for SP modules). Would it be ok to just change the header? There's no real IP or whatsoever.
If this is not allowed, I would simply delete those files and write new ones that contain the same information. Regarding the Expression.g4 license ... It doesn't have a license header, but I added the reference to the UNLICENSE to sort of be a license header ... wasn't this enough? And I did mention it in the LICENSE file (however with the wrong path ... I fixed that) I now added the UNLICENSE text to the main project too (So it's included in the source bundle at root level) and added a mention to the main projects LICENSE. Could you please double check that the way it is now built is correct ... don't want to do more than one more RC. Chris Am 24.10.19, 17:29 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread. Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes. If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and then take the details to this thread.
