Haha, yeah, we are the no-profile-wing :D
Am 11.12.19, 11:54 schrieb "Strljic, Matthias Milan"
<[email protected]>:
Hahaha xD i think for that we need soon an organigram :D
Matthias Strljic, M.Sc.
Universität Stuttgart
Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und
Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW)
Seidenstraße 36
70174 Stuttgart
GERMANY
Tel: +49 711 685-84530
Fax: +49 711 685-74530
E-Mail: [email protected]
Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 11:43 AM
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle Docker?
Ok ...
so as the biggest "less-profiles"-party members agreed on this, I'll pursue
this path ... now it's on file guys :-P
Chris
Am 11.12.19, 10:56 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <[email protected]>:
Hi,
fully agree with Matthias here (<3).
Optional is way better as I usually also do not have my docker host
running as it drains too much energy __
Julian
Am 11.12.19, 10:38 schrieb "Strljic, Matthias Milan"
<[email protected]>:
Hi Chris,
for build compatibility I would go with option 2. Even if I am from
the anti-profil-option party.
With option 1 the PLC4X complete build would be failing because of
a missing docker dependency.
Greetings to all Windows users which do not want to use the Hyper-V
especially with Windows-Core and Windows on ARM.
Mathi
Matthias Strljic, M.Sc.
Universität Stuttgart
Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und
Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW)
Seidenstraße 36
70174 Stuttgart
GERMANY
Tel: +49 711 685-84530
Fax: +49 711 685-74530
E-Mail: [email protected]
Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 10:05 AM
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [DISCUSS] How to handle Docker?
Hi all,
yesterday I had a look at what’s missing in order for us to ship
fully functional StreamPipe modules.
Adding the missing spring-boot repackaging was simple.
I also added Dockerfiles for both modules that successfully build
docker images and should theoretically also deploy them to dockerhub.
HOWEVER … the build like this only works with Docker installed on
your system.
So now to my question 1:
* Do we want to make Docker mandatory? … then I would add a
check to the setup script
* Do we enable the Docker stuff by adding a “with-docker”
profile? … this too would add a Docker detection to the script, but this is
only executed if the profile is enabled.
I would opt for option 2 with the profile and to add this to the
configuration of the release-plugin that this also enables the “with-docker”
profile.
I am however hesitant as I have noticed that some people in the
community dislike having all these profiles and we just got rid of some.
Second thing is:
Do we want to distribute Docker images of things that need it? And
if yes, how do we do it correctly (Justin … this part of the question is
generally directed to you ;) )
I would like to distribute the StreamPipes images and if things are
added, that require it, those too (Perhaps one day the Mock PLC and stuff like
that).
However I don’t want to distribute our examples this way.
Please share your thoughts on these questions.
Chris
