Hi, all … as you probably all know, in the past months I have been a quite intense user of mspec and our code-generaton. There I have encountered situation, where I would like to add new types of fields or change things.
Not I just had an idea that would simplify a lot of things: * A field type “abstract” … it has a type and a name same as a simple field. However it doesn’t actually parse anything. It just adds an abstract get and set method for a given property to the base class. If a discriminated type has an “abstract” field with a given type, all sub-types are required to somehow provide a field of the same type with the same name. I think this could simplify a lot of driver-logic code (Currently I usually to cascades of instance-of checks). Chris
