Hi, yes. Just wanted to add my point here : ) But of course some feedback is very welcome about best practices.
Perhaps we could even hold a formal vote to give it the necessary attention on the list? Julian Am 26.05.20, 09:16 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: Hi Julian, I like the name "adopters" ... sounds better than "users" especially if it's on the "users" part of the website. I would like some feedback from some other ASF folks as in the past they have brought up concerns and I would prefer to hear if they are ok with this. Chris Am 26.05.20, 09:07 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <[email protected]>: Hi Chris, thanks for tackling this. I really like it and in fact I woul dprobably place it even more prominent. I like how eclipse IoT Working Group did it: https://iot.eclipse.org/adopters/ I see no reason why this would not comply with ASF policy. Julian Am 25.05.20, 21:43 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: Hi all, I think we discussed this multiple times but never actually continued. So I took the liberty of adding a new page to our website: https://plc4x.apache.org/users/users.html However this page isn’t linked in the navigation as I want to discuss this first. It’s the plan to allow any company to be listed there. The mechanism on how to get added is by providing a PR. This way we have someone who is in git-blame and which we can say is responsible for having a company added. I updated all links to be “nofollow” links and to open new browser tabs. Would such a page be in-line with the ASF policies? Chris
