Hi Anton,

first, welcome here! : )

Second, thanks fort he report, this is indeed some kind of "undefined" 
situation you run into (but we should handle it better!).

What happens ist hat the request takes longer than our predefined internal 
timeout (I think thats 1second or only 500ms) and then the Handler 
"deregisters" and the "request-reply" pattern cannot be finished successfully.
This also happens if you use some kind of VPN where latency is high.

We have to come up with a solution fort hat ASAP.
Would you mind opening an Issue in Jira, then I will try to provide a fix ASAP 
and we can discuss if we want to do a release 0.7.1 with this fix (and some 
others that were reported by the community).

Best!
Julian

Am 06.07.20, 16:02 schrieb "Engman Anton" <[email protected]>:

    Hello everybody,

    I am using PLC4X to poll 29 signals from a Siemens S7-300 device,  all the 
signals are of data type REAL. Every second I send a request to the PLC asking 
for the values and then printing one of the values to the console:

    PlcConnection conn = 
driverManager.getConnection("s7:tcp://<IP>?remote-rack=0&remote-slot=1&controller-type=S7_300");
    PlcReadRequest.Builder builder = conn.readRequestBuilder();
    builder.addItem("value1", "DB.50.DBD0:REAL");
    .
    .
    .
    builder.addItem("value29", "DB.50.DBD116:REAL");
    PlcReadRequest readRequest = builder.build();

    while(true)
    {
                              PlcReadResponse r = readRequest.execute().get();
                              System.out.println(r.getObject("value1"));

                              Thread.sleep(1000);
    }

    Everything works fine for some time, but after >50K requests or 8-12 hours 
with the current polling rate at 1 second the code waits forever at the return 
value from PlcReadResponse r = readRequest.execute().get() and doesn't 
continue. I enabled Trace logging to see what's happening and every time this 
error occurs I get the following error message:

    12:56:48.107 [nioEventLoopGroup-2-1] TRACE 
o.a.plc4x.java.spi.Plc4xNettyWrapper - Checking handler 
HandlerRegistration#65120 for Object of type TPKTPacket
    12:56:48.107 [nioEventLoopGroup-2-1] TRACE 
o.a.plc4x.java.spi.Plc4xNettyWrapper - Handler HandlerRegistration#65120 has 
right expected type TPKTPacket, checking condition
    12:56:48.107 [nioEventLoopGroup-2-1] TRACE 
o.a.plc4x.java.spi.Plc4xNettyWrapper - Registration HandlerRegistration#65120 
does not match object TPKTPacket (currently wrapped to S7MessageResponseData)
    12:56:48.107 [nioEventLoopGroup-2-1] TRACE 
o.a.plc4x.java.spi.Plc4xNettyWrapper - Checking handler 
HandlerRegistration#65119 for Object of type TPKTPacket
    12:56:48.107 [nioEventLoopGroup-2-1] TRACE 
o.a.plc4x.java.spi.Plc4xNettyWrapper - Handler HandlerRegistration#65119 has 
right expected type TPKTPacket, checking condition
    12:56:48.107 [nioEventLoopGroup-2-1] TRACE 
o.a.plc4x.java.spi.Plc4xNettyWrapper - Registration HandlerRegistration#65119 
does not match object TPKTPacket (currently wrapped to S7MessageResponseData)
    12:56:48.107 [nioEventLoopGroup-2-1] TRACE 
o.a.plc4x.java.spi.Plc4xNettyWrapper - No registered handler found for message 
TPKTPacket[payload=COTPPacketData[parameters={},payload=S7MessageResponseData[tpduReference=0,parameter=S7ParameterReadVarResponse[numItems=19],payload=S7PayloadReadVarResponse[items={S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={66,61,-103,-102}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={66,65,51,51}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={65,-104,0,0}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={65,-120,0,0}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={65,-103,-103,-102}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={65,-127,-103,-102}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={65,-106,102,103}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={65,-96,0,0}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={66,-8,-26,-124}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={63,101,-95,48}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={0,0,0,0}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={63,-101,-114,57}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={68,122,0,0}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={65,-102,102,103}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={-66,109,9,123}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={0,0,0,0}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={-71,-67,-96,0}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={0,0,0,0}],S7VarPayloadDataItem[returnCode=OK,transportSize=REAL,dataLength=4,data={0,0,0,0}]}],errorClass=0,errorCode=0],eot=true,tpduRef=0]],
 using default decode method

    And this error message is the last thing that is printed to my console, 
it's like the code is going into an infinite loop or something.
    I used Wireshark to look at the packets coming from the PLC, I thought that 
maybe there's a malformed packet or something that's causing the error message 
above, but the packet looks exactly the same as the packets which are decoded 
successfully. I have also experimented with the connection string, using with 
and without the controller-type parameter, but without any difference.
    I've also tried to increase the polling rate, requesting the values every 
100ms, and that will cause the above error to appear after 1-2 hours so it 
seems like the error appears based on the number of requests rather than some 
time interval.
    I have also tried to only poll for 1 signal instead of 29 but the same 
error still appears after >50K requests.
    I have a stable connection to my PLC during the entire time using an 
Ethernet cable without any significant delay.

    Anyone has any thoughts on what may cause this error?
    I would be very grateful for any kind of answers since this is causing an 
halt in my work.

    Best regards,
    Anton Engman

Reply via email to