Hi all,

a little discussion on the IoTDB list made me realize that I never actually 
discussed this here and I'd like to do it before we start the next release.

This will be the first containing Go content. Go resolves dependencies quite 
differently as it doesn't ship binaries, but you instead reference Git 
repositories (GitHub is actually best integrated type). You reference a version 
of a Go library via git tags. So if you want a version 1.2.3, you actually 
reference a tag named "v1.2.3". I have seen that if you don't stick to that 
some tools and utils might have problems.

So I would like to ask you, if you would agree that we change the release-tag 
naming scheme from "releases/{full-version}" to "v{full-version}" ... it 
doesn't have any side-effects to any other tools. And it would eliminate the 
little discrepancy in the naming "release" branch, but "releases/" as prefix 
for tags (because if there's a branch called "release" we can't prefix a tag 
with "release/".

So what do you think?

Chris

Reply via email to