+0 for SPDX, Don't know much about what benefits it provides but it seems simple enough to implement.
As well as +0 for number 2. On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:16 PM Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure if its "allowed" but: > > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 */ > > avoids spam and means less scrolling which is a define win. > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Friday, July 2nd, 2021 at 19:27, Christofer Dutz < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Oh... > > > > Forgot to state that I would prefer Nr. 2 > > > > Chris > > > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg > > > > From: Christofer Dutz [email protected] > > > > Sent: Friday, July 2, 2021 7:02:17 PM > > > > To: [email protected] [email protected] > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Clean up the Apache Headers? > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have noticed that we seem to be degrading regarding to how nice our > > > > Apache Headers look. While they are all valid version, they quite often > > > > don't seem to look nice, in my opinion. > > > > /* > > > > Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one > > > > or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file > > > > distributed with this work for additional information > > > > regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file > > > > to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the > > > > "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance > > > > with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > > > Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > > > > software distributed under the License is distributed on an > > > > "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY > > > > KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the > > > > specific language governing permissions and limitations > > > > under the License. > > > > / > > > > Sort of looks less pretty than this: > > > > / > > > > - Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one > > - or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file > > - distributed with this work for additional information > > - regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file > > - to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the > > - "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance > > - with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > > > > - http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > > > - Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > > - software distributed under the License is distributed on an > > - "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY > > - KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the > > - specific language governing permissions and limitations > > - under the License. > > > > / > > > > Doesn't matter which ones you prefer, I think they should at least > all > > > > be the same. At least all files that work with "/" ... "*/" comments. > > > > If you agree, which ones would you prefer? > > > > 1. The first one and I think all should look that way > > 2. The one with the " * "in every line and I think all should look that > way > > 3. I don't care and I think we shouldn't change it > > 4. I prefer yet another variant and all should look like that > > > > Chris >
