>From a Nifi point of view, having possibly many background threads that are not in the thread pools and governed by the Nifi scheduler is a bad idea, I *think*.
I would recommend that you take to the [nifi dev mailing list or slack]( https://nifi.apache.org/mailing_lists.html) for further discussion on the best implementation and have that straight. Maybe it will get checked off on as well. I will see things in either place as I am a committer on Nifi as well. On May 15, 2023 at 11:05:50 AM, Unai Leria ([email protected]) wrote: Hi again, I think even if the subscriptions would rely on internal polling a NiFi processor that gives access to subscription operation would be a nice addition to the integration. Furthermore we would be covering all operations except browsing (for which I don't see a use case in NiFi). I been testing and improving the proof of concept so the main work is already done. I will create a PR soon Thanks for the feedback! Unai
