Hi all, so I just initiated the creation of the plc4x-extras repo and I guess it will be created in a few minutes.
I would propose we keep the naming scheme identical to the main repo: * Development is done on “develop” * Releases are merged to “release” Regarding components that should be moved to the extras repo, how about this: * plc4c/examples/** * plc4c/integrations/** * plc4x/tools/plc4x-server * plc4go/examples/** * plc4go/tools/plc4xbrowser * plc4go/tools/plc4xpcapanalyzer * (it looks as if plc4go/tools/generator and licenser are tools used for the build) * plc4j/examples/** * plc4j/integrations/** * plc4j/tools/opcua-server * plc4j/tools/plc4x-server * plc4j/tools/ui/** What do you think? I would propose to keep the directory structure and I would try to replicate the general build as it was in a mono-repo before. I guess the main repo build will then live with a LOT less managed dependencies and plugins managed. Chris
