Looks good to me, see nothing wrong, don't miss anything.

- Sebastian

On 2025/11/27 10:41:00 Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> As many of you might know, mid of this year I applied for several public 
> research funding rounds with the main goal to refactor PLC4J to rid ourselves 
> of some of the technical debt we have piled up. Most of the work was around 
> rewriting the current SPI to work entirely without Netty. Beyond that to 
> implement a Transport layer that supports multiple connection instances to 
> share one transport instance (Like needed for ModbusRTU and BacNET, …) Also 
> to allow multiple transport instances being used by one connection instance 
> (Like for Profinet and Cesar’s S7 variant).
> 
> Now it seems that both applications were judged favorably. Now I could need 
> some input from you guys where you see more need for cleaning up.
> 
> So far, the tasks I applied and which I just got informed that they received 
> Funding are:
> 
> 
>   *
> Implement new SPI
>      *
> Implement new Read-/WriteBuffers that work without third party dependencies
>      *
> Update the code generation framework
>      *
> Implement a  new system for pluggable transports
>      *
> Implement the code for the concept of a layered protocol drivers
>   *
> Update the existing drivers to use the new SPI
> 
> The second package I would try to change the other would be:
> 
>   *
> Implement a new Code-Generation for PLC4J based on JavaPoet (Getting rid of 
> freemarker (at least for Java))
>   *
> Implement a new connection-cache component
>   *
> Implement a new Scraper alternative (able to use subscription-based triggers)
>   *
> Implement a new Base-Driver that emulates subscriptions by using the new 
> scraper
>   *
> Fix the issues in the S7 driver allowing us to merge the two back together
>   *
> Add some Audit-Log functionality, that allows us to better diagnose issues
> 
> Does that make sense from your perspective?
> Anything missing you think I should focus on?
> 
> I think a bit quicker feedback than usually here would be helpful, as I need 
> to finish the Sovereign Tech Fund paperwork as soon as possible.
> 
> Chris
> 

Reply via email to