DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35928>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35928 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-09 01:40 ------- The patch doesn't look to be threadsafe to me If we had two files open, one with a 512 blocksize, and another with a 4096 blocksize, then I think it'd fail, as it's all using a single static int on POIFSFileSystem I think before we could apply this, we would need a sample file with the alternate block size (so we can write a unit test for all this), and the patch would need to be slightly re-worked to be threadsafe (i.e. not use a static for something that can vary between concurrantly open files). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
