Cheers! Quite an accomplishment!

Dave

On Dec 28, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Nick Burch wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Nick Burch wrote:
>> Just a heads-up that I'm planning to spending some time while I'm off over 
>> Christmas working on a lower memory POIFS implementation. The idea is to 
>> have it load blocks on demand, in disk instead of logical order, rather than 
>> the current code which loads everything and sorts before use.
>> 
>> Initially I'm aiming for enough support to be able to read the directory 
>> listing, and read streams. I'm not intending to support write, but I do aim 
>> to leave extension hooks in place so it can be added later if anyone wants 
>> to! Performance wise, I suspect it'll be faster to load, but slower to read 
>> streams (due to disk seeks)
> 
> I think we're now largely there with this, with all the code in svn trunk. It 
> still needs to be documented, and not all the POIDocument implementations can 
> work with it for read (write isn't supported yet)
> 
> However, running HPSFPropertiesExtractor against a 9mb file:
> * POIFSFileSystem - minimum Xmx 12mb, average time 250ms
> * NPOIFSFileSystem - minimum Xmx 2mb, average time 190ms
> So, the new code is both lower memory and faster, which seems a result!
> 
> Once write support is done, and tested, I'd lean towards making NPOIFS an 
> option for one release, then rename POIFS to OPOIFS and make NPOIFS the new 
> default. More on that when they're feature compatible though!
> 
> Nick
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to