On Jul 28, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Jon Svede wrote: > Is there a policy here to work on a single issue per ticket? Some places I > have > been like to seen a ticket be very specific to one issue. This ticket > actually > defines two issues and implies a third. > > Should I split this into multiple tickets? This once can be used for the fix > to > the code and then two new ones for the docs and an example (it's not > requested > but seems implied by the need for a docs update).
It's your choice. If it were me I would do all three in the same issue. Maybe the way to determine the answer is to ask this question: Will you be resolving all three at once, or will one of the three issues take longer than the others? Regards, Dave > > Jon > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thu, July 28, 2011 8:53:30 AM > Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51548] Missing "handler" Entry in Excelant ANTLIB > File and Documentation > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51548 > > --- Comment #2 from Jon Svede <[email protected]> 2011-07-28 14:53:30 UTC --- > r1151847 addresses the code issue - missing definition. I also added more > Javadoc to the ExcelAntHandlerTask class. I need to work on an example and > updating the docs. > > -- > Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
