Should we include rat-check in the dist target? it should be pedantic IMO.
There is no point to generate a release with missing licence headers.



On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Nick Burch <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Yegor Kozlov wrote:
>
>> A candidate for the POI-3.10-FINAL release is available at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/
>>
>
> Sorry, but I'm going to have to -1 this release
>
> Several of the files in the src package seem to be missing license
> headers, as shown from "ant rat-check"
>
> FWIW, the release-guide docs do have that check as step 7 in the release
> Prerequisites :/
>
> Nick
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to